NFP Facility logo

NFP Facility Partnership

Mongolia Mongolia

 

The Partnership between the NFP Facility and Mongolia was launched in 2002. At that time, implementation was planned to occur in three phases: (i) developing a bottom-up approach to institutional improvements through capacity building and a participatory process at both the national and 'aïmag' levels; (ii) carrying out sub-sector reviews and development of strategies; and (iii) developing a participatory process for the formulation and adoption of a national forest policy. The first round of calls for proposals one was complete by 2004, the second round by 2009 and the rd and last round was done in 2010. In early 2011 five letters of agreement were signed to support the formulation of a new forest policy in Mongolia. A National Multi-Stakeholder Steering Committee (NMSC) was re-established by the MNET in June 2010 and a workshop on the NFP process was conducted shortly after. The NFP process in Mongolia is up and running. On January 17th, 2012 a National Forest Policy Workshop was organized to finalize the new forest policy. The new forest policy is expecetd to be approved by parliament by February or march 2012. This will end succesfully the support provided by the NFP Facility to reform the Mongolian forestry sector

Points of Contact

16 Dec 2010

Assessment of the nfp

In order to assess the progress and status of the nfp process, the Facility and FAO have designed a matrix to provide a clearer picture of how the country nfp processing are evolving, which elements are well developed and which elements remain weak and in need of further attention. The matrix has been tested in the countries to ensure the relevance of its indicators.

The matrix contains indicators for each phase of the nfp process: analysis, policy formulation, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. The indicators are clustered according to the primary nfp principles: country ownership, inter- and intra-sectoral linkages, partnerships and participation.

The matrix below was completed by stakeholders, in a participatory way, during a national workshop.

Each indicator was rated as follows:

the indicator has not been developed
the indicator is absent from the country nfp process
the indicator exists but is incipient
the indicator is progressing well within the country nfp process
the indicator is completed to the country’s full satisfaction - can serve as a model for others to follow

Implemented Activities