NFP Facility logo

NFP Facility Partnership

Guatemala Guatemala

The Partnership Agreement between the NFP Facility and Guatemala was signed in February, 2004. The main objective of the Agreement was to enhance national capacity for dissemination, implementation and monitoring of Guatemala's national forest programme (nfp). NFP Facility support has been focused on the sustaining of national and sub-national processes through studies, debates, networking and proposals for investment and management of forest resources. Support has also been specifically orientated towards improving forestry sector governance in the public, private and community arenas.

In June, 2008, following an assessment and evaluation conducted using the nfp-matrix of the outputs and impacts of the first four years of work, the NFP Facility and Guatemala renewed their commitment to working together on the nfp process by signing a new Partnership Agreement. The objective of this second Agreement is to reinforce the capacities of forestry and forestry related stakeholders in order to strengthen linkages and participation in the nfp. A key component of the new Partnership Agreement will be the implementation of a regular monitoring and evaluation of Guatemala's progress and accomplishments by a monitoring team.

Points of Contact

16 Dec 2011

Assessment of the nfp

In order to assess the progress and status of the nfp process, the Facility and FAO have designed a matrix to provide a clearer picture of how the country nfp processing are evolving, which elements are well developed and which elements remain weak and in need of further attention. The matrix has been tested in the countries to ensure the relevance of its indicators.

The matrix contains indicators for each phase of the nfp process: analysis, policy formulation, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. The indicators are clustered according to the primary nfp principles: country ownership, inter- and intra-sectoral linkages, partnerships and participation.

The matrix below was completed by stakeholders, in a participatory way, during a national workshop.

Each indicator was rated as follows:

the indicator has not been developed
the indicator is absent from the country nfp process
the indicator exists but is incipient
the indicator is progressing well within the country nfp process
the indicator is completed to the country’s full satisfaction - can serve as a model for others to follow

Implemented Activities