NFP Facility logo

NFP Facility Partnership

Rwanda Rwanda

Rwanda became a Partner of the National Forest Programme Facility (NFP Facility) in 2003, and will continue receiving support of that programme till Dec 2011. NFP Facility support was requested by Rwanda to enforce the objectives stated in the Vision 2020 and in the Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS), contributing to achieving the equilibrium between supply and demand in forest needs. The NFP Facility stimulated the nfp process in line with decentralization reforms, with emphasis on the importance of stakeholder participation and sensitizing rural actors to a range of forestry issues. Stakeholders were assisted in the development of new approaches and capacities for managing forest resources at District Level. Activities carried out include the establishment and updated website for forestry in Rwanda allowing the sharing of lesson learnt at national, strengthen the forest extension services ensuring that the forest policy and laws in Rwanda are well known and respected by stakeholders and by the public at large with the aim to reduce forests degradation. Facility support was also given (and continues to be given) to NAFA for its coordination and supervision role in the Rwanda National Forest Programme.

Points of Contact

20 Dec 2011

Assessment of the nfp

In order to assess the progress and status of the nfp process, the Facility and FAO have designed a matrix to provide a clearer picture of how the country nfp processing are evolving, which elements are well developed and which elements remain weak and in need of further attention. The matrix has been tested in the countries to ensure the relevance of its indicators.

The matrix contains indicators for each phase of the nfp process: analysis, policy formulation, implementation and monitoring and evaluation. The indicators are clustered according to the primary nfp principles: country ownership, inter- and intra-sectoral linkages, partnerships and participation.

The matrix below was completed by stakeholders, in a participatory way, during a national workshop.

Each indicator was rated as follows:

the indicator has not been developed
the indicator is absent from the country nfp process
the indicator exists but is incipient
the indicator is progressing well within the country nfp process
the indicator is completed to the country’s full satisfaction - can serve as a model for others to follow

Implemented Activities